The Clash of Civilizations?

The Clash of Civilizations? It is Samuel Huntingtons opinion that combat in the post-Cold fight knowledge base would be caused by ethnical differences, conflicts amongst nations and groups of different civilizations. In todays period, it is more common to group countries in terms of their civilization aspects, such(prenominal) as religion or culture, versus that of their economic systems. Huntington explained how fundamental interaction amongst the different civilizations pass on shape the human race we live in and any conflicts will occur amongst the differences of each civilization. Huntington gives five reasons for his beliefs. The early reason is because civilizations argon basic.The differences occur amongst traditions, culture, language, religion, etcetera Secondly, civilizations are seeing extend interaction so people are suitable more aware of those differences. Third, economic transition and social change are ever-changing how people view certain civilizations f rom the agency they may have been viewed before. Fourth, the watt has caused an profit of more people being beaten(prenominal) of otherwisewise civilizations. Fourth, the differences and characteristics of civilizations are less shot those of one civilization cannot simply blend part of another civilization. Finally, there is an increase in economic regionalism.Similar to the second point, there is an increase interaction amongst civilizations. Trade has increased, do people dependent upon other civilizations to deal to their success. Huntington uses the Cold War as the time period where the differences between civilizations would cause conflict, surrogate the differences between political or ideological boundaries. Huntington breaks the world into major civilizations, The West, Latin America, The Orthodox, The eastern World, The Muslim World of the greater gist East, The civilization of sub-Saharan Africa, Lone countries, and tornado countries.Huntington explains ho w the West is a superpower equated to other civilizations and it is often reflected in global decisions, such as that of the International Monetary Fund, freeing in favor of the West. This allows the West to get a line the world, not only with their interests, but with their beliefs as well. As a result, there is conflict amongst the West and other civilizations. As we compare this article to todays world in 2012, I mean that issues that are arising are differences in civilization beliefs.Huntingtons hypothesis, in my opinion has been proven true. For example, The West believes in equality, freedom of speech, human rights, etc. Was that not the entire purpose for immersion Iraq, to eliminate the power of Saddam Hussein, who did not have any beliefs of the Western ways? The West is truly a powerhouse who believes the world should operate as they do which I do not believe will change. Civilizations have held strong in their beliefs especially comparing The West to other civiliz ations, leaving tension amongst them.